“Student Exodus from Area Parochial School Could be Avoided” (By: Michele Babcock-Nice)

St. John Neumann School Billboard, August 12, 2013, Lilburn, Georgia

St. John Neumann School Billboard, August 12, 2013, Lilburn, Georgia

During this Summer of 2013, 15 rising fourth grade students left St. John Neumann Regional Catholic School in Lilburn, Georgia.  Only three new students entered the fourth grade in addition to the 15 who left.  During the Summer of 2012, eight rising third grade students left the school.  Only two students entered the school as new pupils in the third grade.  Interestingly, both of those students also left the school this Summer, after only one year at the school.  Additionally, the vast majority of students who have left are Caucasian; most others are of mixed race parentage.  Each year for the past three years, the school has considerably down-sized in terms of student population as well as faculty.  Currently, all grade levels have two classes; it used to be that most or all grade levels had three classes up until three years ago.

As a person who has been Roman Catholic all of my life, and who has provided a Catholic education to my child, the exodus of students and faculty from St. John Neumann School is concerning and disturbing.  One must ask, then, why there are so many who are leaving the school.  I have the answers to that, and it does not necessarily involve finances, budgets, or economics.

I suspect that I will come across as “the bad guy” to many by sharing this information regarding the school, however it is for my concern for students’ welfare, well-being, safety, and positive growth and development that I am doing so.  Additionally, my son is aware that I have a blog, and he also asked me to include his perspectives; my son is 10-years-old.

First, let me state that St. John Neumann School provides an outstanding – outstanding – education to the students.  Overall, my observations of what students learn through the challenging curriculum are well above my expectations.  Each year that my son was a student at St. John Neumann School, however, was a roller coaster.  There were wonderful and memorable experiences that he had with several outstanding teachers, however there were also many situations that he experienced by peers and adults at the school that were mentally and emotionally harmful and injurious to him. 

I often communicated with both school administrators and school system administrators, encouraging that greater sensitivity, compassion, and understanding be provided to the students.  Some of my suggestions were put into place, and some were not, and some were later removed after they were first implemented.  As an involved parent at the school, as well as an active volunteer for five years there, there was much that I personally observed and/or was informed about by students.  By far, the most serious issue facing students is the bullying, harshness, and often insensitive treatment they experience by administrators and certain teachers and staff.  I often encouraged upper administrators in the past five years to hold sensitivity training for employees of the school, though that never occurred.

Another very serious issue at the school is bullying that students’ experience from their own peers.  Some children repeatedly experienced bullying from teachers, adminstrators, and/or other staff, as well as certain peers.  This has created an unnecessary and avoidable stressful and hostile environment for many students.  One problem is because many of the school employees are so harsh and insensitive toward students, they are bullies themselves, and they therefore do not recognize, nor put a stop to student bullying.  Last year, more than 25% of parents responding to a school survey stated that bullying is a problem at the school.  I am one who has, again, encouraged school system administrators to hold anti-bullying and bullying prevention programs for faculty and staff at the school, however that has also never occurred.  Such training may help reduce bullying and increase sensitivity and compassion of adults and students toward other students.

A further big concern is the overwhelming pressure that is placed on students to be perfect in every area and in every way – academics, behavior, sociality, religion, and extra-curriculars.  Beginning with the youngest children, students who do not complete their homework are regularly disciplined.  In the past, teachers required students to stand outside for 5-10 minutes “on the line” – as they would say, on the outdoor paved parking lot play area, typically in the excessive heat.  This was an unspoken rule practiced by primary and early elementary school teachers and paraprofessionals.  Older children who did not complete homework are required to write answers to particular questions on a “behavior reflection” that reduces or eliminates their 15-20 minutes of recess time. 

St. John Neumann School Parking Lot Play Area, Lilburn, Georgia, May 2012

St. John Neumann School Parking Lot Play Area, Lilburn, Georgia, May 2012

For two of the past five years, another unspoken disciplinary rule practiced by at least three school faculty involved making students walk and/or run “laps” outside during recess on the parking lot, again, typically in the excessive heat.  Sadly, this practice appears to be somewhat of a common, unwritten practice in this area – requiring students to run laps as punishment in excessively high temperatures – as I have discovered that it occurs at many schools.  In regard to one second grade boy, I informed his father that he was required to run laps as punishment by a paraprofessional, outside in the searing heat, and the dad did not believe me.  How sad that some parents are not more concerned about what their child is experiencing at school.

Other teachers at the school regularly separated certain students from their classmates by requiring them to keep their desks far-removed from those of other students, whether for certain assignments or even months at a time.  I often observed where many teachers would use guilt, humiliation, and embarassment toward students to demoralize them into doing what they wanted them to, rather than speak to children with respect, compassion, and understanding. 

Early elementary students are also required to miss 45 minutes of lunch and recess by serving detention in the main office, including for extremely minor offenses.  Such harsh and unnecessary punishments are unethical, demoralizing, and depressing to many students, particulary those outstanding students who get caught in the crossfires of the political drama at the school.  In consulting with employees of other area schools, lengthy detentions are required only in the most severe situations of high school – high school – students, not early elementary students!  I personally requested of school administration to reduce or eliminate this practice, though there was no positive change, and in fact, only a worsening of it, amounting to nothing less than emotional sadism toward students.  When those who are charged with caring for children see nothing wrong with such unnecessary, harsh disciplinary action toward children for the most minor of offenses, definite positive change is needed. 

Also in practice at the school is suspending children as young as second grade – to my knowledge; one very sweet little girl was suspended last Spring for I cannot imagine what.  In other area schools, such a practice of issuing out-of-school suspensions to the youngest students is unheard of and entirely taboo.  Such a practice proves the lack of sensitivity, understanding, and compassion by school administration.

I feel sorry for the students who are at St. John Neumann School due to the harshness, coldness, and lack of sensitivity and compassion that so many experience from alot of adults as well as peers at the school.  I have often encouraged those in charge who could make a positive difference to consider being more sensitive, understanding, kind, and compassionate toward students.   Harsh, demoralizing, excessive, and/or inhumane punishments that are disguised as “disciplinary actions” – even for the most minor of wrongs – are well beyond what school employees should expect of children.

When students get seriously hurt or ill at the school, a parent is lucky to get a phone call or communication about the incident from anyone.  A second-grade student got a serious blow to the head during outdoor play, but no ice was placed on the injury and no phone call was made to parents.  Upon picking up the child from school, it was obvious to the parent that the injury was serious.  When the child spoke of dizziness a number of hours after the injury, the parent took the child to their pediatrician. 

A kindergarten student fell in the hallway and sustained a large gash near her chin.  Parents received no communications from the school about the incident, and only a band-aid was placed on the wound.  Upon removing the band-aid after the child got home, the parent observed the depth of the wound, taking her to the emergency medical clinic where she received four stitches.  There have also been instances in which students were genuinely ill, but when they asked to go to the clinic, they were refused by certain teachers and paraprofessionals.  Keep in mind that absolutely no communications to parents by anyone at the school was made in any of these situations.

Safety is also a concern at the school.  There are no security cameras at the school, so there is no tangible record of situations that occur there – it is one person’s word against another’s.  A parent can inform an administrator about a teacher who belittles, bullies, and yells at a student – such as, simply for asking to use the restroom – but without any recording of it, the administrator does not believe it, does not want to get involved, and further, had already behaved in a bullyish manner toward children, so it is a lost cause.

Additionally, even with improved security measures having been implemented at the school this past Spring, it has not actually gotten better.  All visitors are to sign-in at the front office upon entering the building, however have been many occasion – including since the new policies were implemented – that I personally observed people enter and walk through the building without signing in at all, nor going to the main office.  There are also repeated instances of no one being at the front desk at the main office when people enter the school. 

St. John Neumann School, Lilburn, Georgia, August 2013

St. John Neumann School, Lilburn, Georgia, August 2013

Last Spring, there was an actual “intruder alert” that occurred at the school that was not a drill; I was at the school volunteering when it occurred.  Parents were not informed by any school officials that the intruder alert occurred.  While the Superintendent stated in an archdiocese newspaper article that such drills and procedures regularly occur at all schools, a teacher at the school shared that only one such alert – whether actual or drill – occurred there in the past seven years!  If she means that such alerts and/or drills occur every seven years, she would be correct that they occur regularly, however it has been my experience that many public schools, for example, practice them between 2-4 times each year.  Because these drills and alerts are not “regularly” practiced at the school, many teachers really do not know what to do.  When fire and even tornado drills are practiced more than intruder drills, I for one, am concerned about the safety of my child at the school.

Teachers are also known to leave outside doors propped or even slightly ajar when they are supposed to be closed and locked.  Unfortunately, this is also a practice at many schools, so that late colleagues can enter the school undetected by supervisors.  However, that this is regularly being done on the hallway that houses the youngest children is a serious safety concern.

Again, I will likely be viewed as the bearer of bad news by sharing this information, however I believe that steps need to be taken to make improvements in order to progress rather than regress at St. John Neumann School.  I know I won’t win any awards for my article.  That my son – a 10-year-old – also wanted me to share his views about what he experienced at the school reflects the tone and atmosphere that is present at the school. 

While we have had many wonderful and memorable experiences at the school, as well as having met, interacted with, and befriended many people – including some truly great teachers – it is a serious concern when a school does not live up to it’s mission and standards.  When “teaching the Gospel values” of God and Jesus in the Catholic tradition is merely spoken but not actually practiced by many school representatives, there is definitely something that must change for the better. 

So, at $7,000 per student in tuition only, St. John Neumann lost a total of 18 students from the second and third grades in the past two years.  I think that’s a total of $126,000 if I did my math correctly, right?  That’s alot of money to be losing.  In business, it is always said that it is much easier to retain those people who are already part of an institution rather than recruit new ones.  However, in sharing my perspectives about this to both school administrators and school system administrators, there has been an apathy and lack of concern about it.  For me, personally, as a Catholic and having desired for my child to have a Catholic education, this is a serious concern. 

Thus, the reasons that I have described herein, I believe, are those that have caused the increasing exodus from and diminished size of St. John Neumann School in Lilburn, Georgia.  Isn’t it time for a positive change?  My aim in sharing this information is not to be critical, however it is to be honest and urge for positive change and improvements to occur at the school.  St. John Neumann is surely an excellent school at which students receive an outstanding education.  And again, while we have had many wonderful, exciting, and happy memories at the school, there are also a number of issues that deserve both serious attention and improvement. 

It is definitely disappointing when a school of one’s own faith does not meet minimal expectations regarding the value and treatment of children.  Children should not be perceived, nor treated as bad what with issuing so many unnecessary and harsh punishments; it is the perspectives and training of the adults that need drastic improvement.  Maybe if more people put their heads together, praying and working hard in doing what is in the best interests of children, that will occur.

8 thoughts on ““Student Exodus from Area Parochial School Could be Avoided” (By: Michele Babcock-Nice)

  1. Michelle, you may be the primary problem that your son has. Ever consider that? Sounds to me like you are enabler. My nuns used to weild large sticks aimed at our asses, heads, and hands. Seems like Catholic schools in the south are too easy on them critters. This is stupid.

    • Max, It is unfortunate that you think that way. Perhaps the primary problem that you had was that you were abused by the nuns at your Catholic school. You have judged us without really knowing the details about the situation. Just for the record, about 20 students left my son’s grade level during the same year that we left. The issue is with the school and an inflexible and insensitive administration. There are too many people who do not stand up for children, but I do. Therefore, there are many who dislike me for that. I’m for the children, and most especially my own son; I’m not for adults who are unable to practice what they preach – love, compassion, forgiveness, etc. Such a shame.

  2. I would also like to make a further follow-up. Just because nuns – and other religious – used violence toward children, did not mean it was right. I think we can see in this day and age that many religious who have committed abuses, including sexual abuses, against children have many of their own issues that they have not dealt with, or have not dealt with successfully. In most schools in the United States, Max, what the nuns did to you is a criminal offense – that is called assault. In most schools, individuals who abuse children are arrested and jailed. I say – “most schools” – sadly, because there are also many schools in which this type of abuse toward children is still legal. Take Texas, for example. Texas is the leading state in our country for child mortality (about 4%), due to child abuse. If suicide due to emotional, physical, and sexual abuse was included within that, the rate would be even higher, not only for Texas, but for all states throughout the US. The US leads all Western countries in child deaths due to abuse. Therefore, I say again that I am a protector of children. When a child is dead due to so much emotional, physical, and/or sexual abuse, it is too late, Max, for you to infer that more abuse and violence is needed against children. What is needed is what Jesus would provide – love, support, understanding, and compassion. Individuals who are educators, counselors, psychologists, and psychiatrists, who are also genuinely concerned with children – and the deteriorated educational environment that exists in the US – would honestly tell you that an overhaul is necessary, not only in education, but in American society. I invite you to research Finland’s model educational system. That is what should be strived to achieve in the US. I also invite you to read two of my other posts, the links to which are: http://wp.me/p25c1A-gS and http://wp.me/p25c1A-kp. Violence breeds violence, and it feeds off of more violence. Compassion and understanding are the answers; not abusing children, contributing to injury, harm, and even death. Additionally, this article is the most popular article on my blog. It is controversial, but it is truthful. I am not willing to stand by and allow others to commit emotional, physical, and/or sexual violence against children. More people need to make the same commitment, and take action to see that it ends. More people need to advocate for children, not overlook, ignore, minimize, and discredit them. When they are dead, it’s too late, Max. You can look on the internet and find many links to articles about children and youth who have committed suicide – and/or killed others – because of bullying, and emotional, physical, and/or sexual violence against them that occurred in their schools. One girl that comes to mind is Amanda Todd. If you’d like links to others, I will be glad to provide them – all lives that were unnecessarily lost due to the ignorance, insensitivity, and hatefulness of others.

  3. As Max’s above comments reflect, some people still don’t see the connection between bullying, abuse, and suicide among students in American schools. In fact, some believe that students aren’t treated harshly enough in our schools. This is actually the attitude that prevails at St. John Neumann School, and many other schools, and is a major reason why so many have left such schools. Many who removed their children from such schools have said that it wasn’t soon enough, and I also agree. Violence breeds violence. If people are unable to practice the care and compassion that they preach, they have no business having any responsibility for children and youth. Our educational system – and American society – need positive change when there are still too few people who advocate and protect children and youth from society’s ills. Increased support, and positive change, are needed for children and youth regarding these issues. Please be an advocate for compassion toward children and youth, rather than one who makes these situations worse. Today (April 30, 2014), I posted this article: “Bullying, Abuse, and Suicide Risk Among Students: Ignorance is Bliss for Disbelievers” (found at http://wp.me/p25c1A-yg) in 11 of my LinkedIn groups (and on Twitter) associated with child welfare, children’s rights, education, public policy, social justice, and bullying, including my own anti-bullying group, “People Against Retaliation and Bullying.”

  4. Thank you, Max, for your comments relating to my article. As a result of your comments, you have inspired me to create a new LinkedIn group, “Stop Youth Suicide.” I created the group today. To date, I have invited 70 fellow LinkedIn members from all over the world to join. I have also promoted the group in 28 of the LinkedIn groups in which I am a member, and two in which I am the founder and manager. Three other mental health professionals have already joined and contributed to the group. More support, compassion, sensitivity, and understanding are definitely needed toward children and youth who commit suicide as a result of bullying and abuse, particularly experienced in schools, and especially by peers and adults in those environments.

  5. Hi, Michele. I appreciated your article and insight. My kids went to St John Neumann as well for school, and we left just prior to the timing of your blog. It seemed like there was a lot going on in that timeframe, including a quick change in principals/leadership. Feel free to email me. I appreciate your time.

    • Hi Jon, Thanks for your comments and feedback. The school just became a place that was not a good fit for us – as well as for many others – and I believe it was unfortunate. Things seemed to get worse, not better. While students’ academic performance at the school was excellent, the emotional support they received – overall – was highly lacking. I’m glad we left because things are so much better now. Happy holidays, Michele

Leave a Reply to Max Gresham Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s