Very often in our society, we are informed of criminal offenders who are held responsible and accountable for their actions. There are those in our society who work hard to see to it that perpetrators of crimes are brought to justice, that they are removed from the greater society for a period of time, and so that, potentially, they do not commit the same or similar types of crimes in the future. There are many people, such as a police officers, attorneys, prosecutors, and judges whose hearts and minds are in the right place when it comes to holding responsible and accountable those who commit crimes, particularly violent crimes, including sex crimes.
Conversely, there are also times when people who have committed crimes are not held responsible or accountable for their crimes, nor are they ever required to answer for their criminal actions. In these situations, there may or may not be extenuating circumstances in which evidence has been removed or destroyed by the perpetrators and/or accomplices; corroboration and/or substantiation of facts regarding the crime may not be obtained; confessions of those who committed the crimes were not secured; evidence and/or facts regarding the crime were concealed or never located; and other reasons.
Sometimes, in cases involving child sexual abuse, there is the possibility that police, attorneys, prosecutors, and/or parents do not desire to place children on the stand in court to testify against the person(s) who assaulted them. In other situations, it is possible that a particular network of people, such as athletes or fraternity brothers in a college, promote and live a culture of disrespect and/or violence, covering up for each other when sexual assaults are committed. Or, has often occurred in the Roman Catholic Church when religious have committed sex crimes, they may be protected by higher authorities in the Church.
Many years ago, a local pediatrician in my area informed me that preschools are commonly places where young children are sexually abused. I have always remembered that, and have often wondered why doctors do not do more to inform about this and/or take measures aimed at protecting children. Too often, physicians are more interested in treating a problem or issue after it arises rather than seeking to inform, educate, protect, and prevent such things from occurring in the first place.
In 2007, there were two police reports made regarding a preschool teacher at Sola Fide Lutheran Church Preschool in Lawrenceville, Georgia, describing her repeated sexual abuse of children, aged 2-4, who were in her care. Four children were identified as having been repeatedly emotionally, physically, and sexually abused by the preschool teacher. All four children were interviewed by a special investigator with the county police department. Out of fear, three of the four children denied any sexual abuse by the teacher. Without corroboration, evidence, or a confession by the accused, the case was unable to be substantiated and was closed. Without a formal charge or conviction against the teacher, the case was never made public.
One of the children who had been identified as having been abused was the school principal’s two-year-old daughter, who regularly participated in classes with the three and four-year-olds that were taught by the teacher. In these classes, there was an assistant teacher, as well as a volunteer. The lead teacher perpetrated the abuse that was ignored and overlooked by the other two women. Abuse was perpetrated in the bathroom, storage room, and empty classroom in the trailer that was used for classrooms. During the investigation, the principal destroyed evidence related to the abuse so that it was never identified or recovered by police. Following the close of the investigation, the school promoted the lead teacher who had perpetrated the abuse by providing her with her own classroom and extending the hours of her classes. Two years later, the principal got another job, and he and his family left the school.
In 1995, a rape was reported to campus police at the University at Buffalo that had occurred in 1992 on the Amherst Campus. The rape was committed by a male student against a female student. Both students had been arranged by mutual friends to have a date. The man took the woman to a local bar, and entered the bar and drank though he was underage, having used an inauthentic driver’s license to enter the establishment. During the date, the man persistently encouraged the woman to drink, though she drank little. Following the date and because the student lounge of the woman’s dormitory was a shambles, the woman invited the man in to her dorm room, where he proceeded to deceive her into trusting him, and raped her. The action was against the woman’s will as the man held her down and caused internal injuries to her while raping her. The attack was extremely traumatic for the victim who told her friends about it, and they did nothing, in effect becoming accessories to the crime. In fact, those “friends” never spoke to the survivor again. No one helped the survivor at her university; she coped the best that she could on her own.
When the rape was reported in 1995 to the campus police at the university, one of the police chiefs laughed about it, demoralizing and dehumanizing the survivor. The case went to the county district attorney’s office, but was conveniently found to have exceeded the statute of limitations for the category in which the crime was placed. No support or understanding was offered or provided to the survivor at the university or through the district attorney’s office. Worse, the district attorney who handled the case told the survivor that she had not been raped, thus blaming and revictimizing the victim. The offender got away with his crime, was never required to answer for it, and ended up being protected by the DA’s office and the university police by not being brought to justice for it. Several years following the closure of the case, the perpetrator’s name was deleted from the police report by the campus police, as was the description of the crime that had occurred. Neither the description of the crime, nor the offender’s name were maintained by campus police in the police report, essentially absolving him of the crime and revictimizing the victim.
These are two examples of crimes in which the perpetrators got away with their offenses. They were not held accountable, charged, or prosecuted by the very individuals and agencies that are supposed to be protective against crimes, including sex crimes. While these are just two examples of such situations, there are many more that occur in society every day, and from which perpetrators walk away.
It is important that society be sensitive, understanding, and insightful about victims and survivors of crimes and trauma, including sex crimes. It seems that most people, because they have not been properly trained in relating with crime victims and trauma survivors, stigmatize and revictimize survivors by blaming, shaming, and punishing them. Those who should be held accountable and responsible are the perpetrators, themselves, however and often, people make incorrect assumptions and judgments regarding appearances and surface information without knowing all of the details and information that is confidential.
Jesus was also a person who was inaccurately judged by many. He was a good and merciful person of whom many in power positions were jealous. Jesus was also different in his goodness, different in that he was so good that he tended not to fit in and was, therefore, ostracized and resented by many. Jesus was a person who died as a result of jealousy, hated, and evil of those who were unable to tolerate a good and merciful person, a person who was unique and unsurpassable in his goodness and mercy.
Therefore it follows that it is important for people not to inaccurately judge and/or make incorrect assumptions about each other, especially without having all of the details or confidential information. It is also important that people not stigmatize, blame, punish, and revictimize survivors and victims of crimes, simply out of their own fear, and lack of both insight and understanding. As people, we should strive to be understanding, helpful, and supportive to each other, as well as forgiving, even in the worst of circumstances, yet also stand up for ourselves and the truth, whether or not we are blamed, stigmatized, punished, or revictimized.
Silence protects and empowers the perpetrators of crimes. We must seek to speak out about crimes so that criminals are not protected, and so that the greater society is informed and educated about them.
American Psychological Association (2014). “Understanding child sexual abuse: Education, prevention, and recovery. What are the effects of child sexual abuse?” Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/pubs/info/brochures/sex-abuse.aspx?item=4. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
Babcock-Nice, M. (November 23, 2013). “Trauma-focused group therapy proposal for adult female rape survivors.” Atlanta, GA: Argosy University, Atlanta.
Baldor, L.C. (January 10, 2014). “‘Culture of disrespect’ fuels academy sex assaults.” MSN.com. http://news.msn.com/us/culture-of-disrespect-fuels-academy-sex-assaults. Retrieved January 10, 2014.